10 of the Greatest Domes in the World

Compare and Contrast Wendys vs. Mcdonalds Essay - 918 Words

McDonald’s Versus Wendy’s Kimmeka Bowman Comm/155 June 15, 2013 J. Trammell McDonald’s Versus Wendy’s What do you typically order when dining at McDonald’s or Wendy’s? When I am having a meal from either place, my favorite choice is a fried chicken sandwich with lettuce, tomato, bacon and extra mayo. Sometimes, I may make it a combo and enjoy the greasy, salty french fries and an ice cold soft drink. Most of their customers often purchase the unhealthiest options because they feel as if that is what fast food is all about, right? Fortunately, it does not have to be that way. Fast food can be convenient and nutritious. Wendy’s and McDonald’s are both fast food restaurants, so they are alike in many†¦show more content†¦Wendy’s version of the Dollar menu is titled â€Å"Right Price, Right Size† menu. It has also introduced a feast after dark that is available after 10 p.m. This meal is made up of their Double Stack cheeseburger (pickles, onions, ketchup and mustard), an order of chili cheese fries and a 32 ounce drink for only $5. With the many options, customers must decide if they are looking for convenience and unhealthy food choices. One of the more unhealthy options at McDonald’s is a new sandwich, Bacon Habanero Ranch Quarter Pounder with Cheese. This monster of a sandwich is made with a quarter pound of 100% beef. It is topped with white cheddar cheese, Applewood smoked bacon, tomato, leaf lettuce and a spicy but creamy habanero ranch sauce on a toasted bun. Sounds delicious until the nutritious facts are given. This sandwich alone has 610 calories, 31 grams of fat, and 46 grams of carbohydrates. The fat in this sandwich is 48% of the recommended daily value. Adding fries and a drink to pair with this sandwich increases the calorie count for this meal to well over 1100. Remember, the average person consumes about 2000 calories a day. While these facts are shocking to some, Wendy’s also has some options that can be damaging to one’s health. Th e Baconator is at the top of the list. The name by itself says heart attack. This signature sandwich has not one, but two quarter pound ground beef patties. Like McDonald’s, it has Applewood smoked bacon. However, the only toppings areShow MoreRelatedEvaluation and Marketing Recommendations for in-N-Out1690 Words   |  7 PagesCheeseburger 4. 790 likes 540 dislikes: Whataburger Original Whataburger 5. 716 likes 549 dislikes: Fuddruckers 6. 807 likes 880 dislikes: Burger King Whopper 7. 772 likes 689 dislikes: Wendy’s Baconator 8. 314 likes 143 dislikes: In-N-Out Animal Style 9. 714 likes 687 dislikes: Wendy’s 1/4 Lb. Single 10. 512 likes 344 dislikes: Steak n Shake Double Steakburger The ranking above shows us that â€Å"In-N-Out Double-Double Burger† get the most likes from customers. The freshly bakedRead MoreU.s. Fast Food Industry2903 Words   |  12 Pagestheir main core products and venturing into other products as a means of increasing sales and as a smart growth strategy. For example, Pizza hut started selling chicken wings and other non-pizza items, McDonalds, Wendy’s, burger king( to mention a few) started selling chicken sandwiches, McDonald for example started selling burritos breakfast, ice-cream, yoghurt etc. This has made products seen as substitutes now as direct competitors because of diversification. 2. Using Porter s Five-ForcesRead MoreCaso Mcdonald ´S9665 Words   |  39 Pagesalready challenging competitive situation? Finally, could the lessons learned in the recent collaboration with the EDF help McDonald’s as it sought solutions to the continuing competitive challenge? †¢ †¢ The Speedee Service System Dick and Mac McDonald opened their first drive-in restaurant in 1941, relying on carhops— waiters who went from car to car—to take orders from patrons parked in the restaurant’s large lot. In 1948, the brothers abandoned their popular format and introduced self-serviceRead MoreMarketing Mistakes and Successes175322 Words   |  702 Pagesstudents can hone their analytical skills and also their persuasive skills—not selling products but selling their ideas—and defend them against critical scrutiny. This is great practice for the arena of business to come. NEW TO THIS EDITION In contrast to the early editions, which examined only notable mistakes, and based on your favorable comments about recent editions, I have again included some well-known successes. While mistakes provide valuable learning insights, we can also learn fromRead MoreManagement Course: Mba−10 General Management215330 Words   |  862 Pagesstrength of customer spending, especially when times are tight. Study of the current economy indicates that when today’s consumer is completely satisfied with his or her product or service purchase, he or she tells six other potential buyers. In contrast, a dissatisfied consumer informs 25 other potential buyers. That is the leverage of quality in shaping consumer sentiment, which is vital in powering the two-thirds of the American economy that is consumer-driven. Therefore, as companies again goRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pages269 United Chemical Company 269 Byron vs. Thomas 271 Active Listening Exercise 272 SKILL APPLICATION 274 Activities for Communicating Supportively Suggested Assignments 274 Application Plan and Evaluation 274 274 SCORING KEYS AND COMPARISON DATA 276 Communicating Supportively 276 Scoring Key 276 Comparison Data 276 Communication Styles 276 Comparison Data 276 SKILL PRACTICE Diagnosing Problems and Fostering Understanding: United Chemical Company and Byron vs. Thomas 278 Observer’s Feedback Form

Journal Of Work Organizational Psychology -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Journal Of Work Organizational Psychology? Answer: Introduction: Strategic management helps the organizations to design methods according to their organizational needs and mange resources in appropriate ways. In order to set goals as well as objectives to guide the companies properly, the managers usually plan strategies that reduces time consumption and complete tasks in an efficient way (Daspit et al. 2017). Strategic management includes objective setting properly, analysing the internal structure of the organization, evaluating the effectiveness of the strategies and guarantee that the authority of the organization properly implements them in the organizations. For the recent competitive business world, strategic management has become vital for every organization to survive. Every department of an organization focus on planning their own strategies to achieve their goals. Sales managers strategize marketing strategies and the operational managers explore strategies starting from research, development, raw material sourcing to distributors connects. The chief priority is given to these strategies as they assist to identify the methods which are essential for the companies to stack up more than their competitors in the same market. Strategic management involves the proper recognition of the opportunities along with threats which put the companies at risk (Simsek et al. 2015). These can be come from the internal culture of the organization as well as from the competitors. In an organization, there are different levels of management among which strategic one is most important because this cater all the departments of a firm. It assists the management of the corporations to maintain the overall direction by specifying their objectives and develop business models so that the companies can build core competencies. The chief aim of the strategies to develop the strength of the companies so they can have more competitive advantage and maintain unique position. Strategies also help to solve the emerging issues that may be the cause of the companys deterioration of the business. The stakeholder approach defines the importance of the stakeholders in the companys management strategies. It assures only by satisfying the demands of the stakeholders, the company will be getting proper competitive advantages. Stakeholder approach: In management, thi paproach defines that the managers of an organisation must formulate as well as implement such strategies that satisfy all the needs of the stakeholders of the company and ensure the reputation and long term success of the organization. To follow the most successful paths and increase degree of participation of different groups in the competitive market, the company will be gaining advantage of the market imperfections so that it can create all valuable opportunities (Tarakci, Ates and Wooldridge 2015). The stakeholders approach of strategic management emphasises the dynamic management of the business ambience, improved relationship as well as promotion of the shared interests. This approach is purely based on the theory of stakeholders that arises as the counterpart to the most dominant way of considering and realisation of the business as well as market. Based on these research, the management are to focus on the stakeholders satisfaction. Proper implementation o f this approach can strengthen the value of the corporations as well as create competitive advantages in the market. However, some of the researchers have criticised this approach of strategic management stating that it puts overvaluation to the customers and stake holders therefore fail to reach the consensus (Short et al. 2016). Viability: The obligations of the stakeholders have been with the companies since the origin of the concept of corporate firms. The development of stakeholder theory not only cares for securing the interest of the stakeholders as the owners or investors but also for them who are responsible for providing the company all required materials to produce their goods or services. The ownership perspective in one hand is rooted in the property law and creates the base for the natural basis of primary stakeholders rights, it also claims for the fiduciary obligations of the corporate managers where the perspective to view the corporation as the bundle of contract permits (Xi et al. 2015). The stakeholder framework assists the manfhemnet to maximise the single objective function as one of the most useful ways to strategic management. It is a continuous process of balancing as well as integrating multiple relationships and diverse objectives. In an organization, the directors often face the situations whe re protecting the interest of any one of the stakeholders make others interests vulnerable and the companies feel impossible to avoid such situations (Pearson, Bergiel and Barnett 2014). In such cases, the theories of the stakeholder approach successfully guide to solve these problems. This approach creates room for the rights of the stakeholders of a company by allowing the shareholders, creditors as well as other constituenciesin the management concerns of the company. This enhance the competitive advantage and creates numerous benefits including market penetration. Benefits: Competitive advantage: stakeholder approach to strategic management is able to create more competitive advantage compare to the other strategic approaches. It creates link between the stakeholders and the company where the stakeholders perceive the clear application of the institutional values first and then relate those values with their own interests (ONeill 2016). Through this theory the companies get the appropriate information about their values stakeholders based on which they treat them accordingly as well as develop essential initiatives. This is the process through which the companies create stronger brad recognition in the market. It also helps to gain reputation along with loyalty or trust from the customers and the other stakeholders (Moura-Leite, Padgett and Galn 2014). Thus gain huge competitive advantage in the market. The elements of loyalty and reputation earned by a particular company largely affect the competitors as they create barriers for others who want to know about the stakeholder utility programs. The companies who fool stakeholder approach to form its management strategies are the first to have facilities like getting information about the market trends and stakeholders requirements. Based on these issues, the companies are able to satisfy the market in one hand and develop unique expertise (Marvel, Davis and Sproul 2016). These acquired skills can be practised transmitted, supported as well as reinforced in the organizations operations to create core competencies. According to the researchers, this approach has become indispensable for every organizational culture to gain competitive advantage in the market. Innovation to create value: the stakeholders of some corporate firm include their employees. These firms who follow the stakeholder approach, become efficient to attract more eligible and high quality workforce. The job satisfaction among the employees also has impact on the capability of the companies as the employees are responsible to foster innovation. The employees of a firm think about long term engagement with their firm as well as generate valuable ad potential ideas for development of the companies (Mahto and Khanin 2015). These firms can access to the information from their stakeholders which they employ in innovating new products or customise existing products for more profit. Reciprocity is one of the key aspects in stakeholders approach where the satisfied customer sand employees provide assistance and reveal more information about the utility functions as they stand in benefit. This create opportunity for the firm owners and the managers to meet the consumer requirement s through proper knowledge of their suppliers and customers as well as other stakeholders. They utilise the information more flexibly and strategically. Implementation issues: Implementing the stakeholder approach in the strategies of an organization faces problems both interminably as well as externally. As mentioned above, the management needs to cater for all the stakeholders without any discrimination but they come across numerous issues while implementing as all of them have different interests. Beside this, the researchers reveal that the stakeholders of a company practically do not have any power to initiate the corporation actions (Kramar 2014). Moreover, they are more vulnerable to the management misconduct than any non-shareholder constituencies Limitations: Overvaluing stakeholders: according to the researchers, the companies gather information from their stakeholders in utility functions to gain more competence but it proves to increase cost that exceed benefits. This is how, the mangers intention to generate value with the help of the stakeholders, ends up in allotting too many resources that increase cost. Divergent interests: the implication any policy in the company aiming to satisfy the stakeholders may produce different perspectives and make it difficult to reach consensus because different stakeholders play for different internets (Hill, Jones and Schilling 2014). Moreover, the it is also necessary to notice that not every stakeholder have equal power. The more powerful actors get much benefits from the firms profitability. Therefore, with distribution of value, the stakeholders cannot assume for maximization of returns. Starbucks success: Starbucks is one of the leading beverage company that has been offering ready-made coffee in its outlets across the world. Therefore, it can be stated that they have their stakeholders in all over the world whose interests are to be catered by the company efficiently (Starbucks.com, 2018). Employees are the chief stakeholders of the company as they are the main driving forces of the companys growth in international markets. The company terms their employees as their partners and try to build an open a direct relationship with them. It has more than 200,000 employees working in various outlets in various continents. The employees are providing with health care facilities which is the chief reason of their satisfaction. Mangers of every outlets act as the coaches, entrepreneurs, community ambassadors finally boss to the employees. They have scope for working part-time for which they get proper salaries. Starbucks also have allowed the labour union to speak for the interest of the employees and negotiate with the company policies in any matter. The employees are allowing to have active participation in the decision making procedure as well as reformation of the company. Starbucks presses most in the trading procedure of the managers as they handle the front line workers. They also play crucial role in maintaining the employee relation. Through them the company directly mountains good relation with its most important stakeholder. Shareholders: Starbucks polishes the list of their shareholders annually since its establishment in 1992. They maintain best relationship with their shareholders that no other companies in similar sector have done before. Starbucks have more than 25,000 shareholders in all over the world. The company provides necessary information and quart ion and answer for their investors and communicate with them through mailing documents if the shareholders choose to receive the information through electronic medium. They arrange annual meetings with shareholders and biennial investor conference. The company has proved itself to be a public trade firm and properly utilise the digital media to communicate with their stakeholders. Moreover, the company has sections that assist the investors with all the informations of the company in detail. These sections are efficient to clarify the roars about the company. Starbucks use emails and other digital modes to keep updating their activities o that the shareholders have proper information at proper time. Customers: according to the company updates it has a huge group of loyal customers in all over the world. It claims that they have successfully established the unique coffee culture which have led the company to have great customer satisfaction as well as brand recognition. The aim of the company is to gather knowledges from the social and economic trend of a market and introduce their product in right time. As the theory discloses that stakeholder approach helps the companies to innovate new products that generate more returns. This great relationship with the customers have created scope for learning new things from the market and cater services accordingly. The company is engaged in communication with their customers mainly through below the line promotional activities rather than above the line advertisements. The customers do not get information from any newspapers, posters or from traditional media but they have the largest chain of loyal customers by creating a successful bran d in these decades. It also does not comply with the method of advertising through direct communication with the customers. In the retail stores, the company has adopted the method of experiential advertising by creating an unmatchable customer experience. They also use the concept of sense marketing through their exceptional coffee aroma or designing interior iOS that adds to the atmosphere of the stores an aesthetic value therefore, the customers feel attracted to and the employees also feel satisfied while working (Ghezzi, Cortimiglia and Frank 2015). The company utilizes the internet most in connecting with their customers as most of their customers belong to a socially higher class and have preference on the social media updates. In the websites of the company they ate allowed to provide feedbacks so that the company get idea of the trends as well as the needs of the market (Hammond, Pearson and Holt 2016). This help a lot in gaining competitive advantage. Franchises: as the company claims, more than 49% of the Starbucks are licences stores. These are completely operated by the franchisees. Through these franchisees, the company penetrate the foreign markets. These franchisees pay Starbucks as they use Starbucks logos, recipes and all other benefits from the corporate marketing campaigns. The company has both types of franchisees: domestic and international (Georgakakis and Ruigrok 2017). The companys domestic franchisees work in the airports, colleges, universities, resorts and hospitals and the places where the company has some restrictions in operating. These franchisees enjoy autonomy as Starbucks does not interfere in their operations. The licensed Starbucks stores operating in forcing markets have full sovereignty in management and operations as this is the method how the company enters the foreign markets (Bergmann and Stephan 2013). They are offered support from the company and operate liberally as they have the best knowledge of the countrys regulations as well as markets. These franchisees operate freely abiding by the laws and demands of the countries but do not twist the chief principles of an ideal Starbucks store. They promote the brand and perform successfully. The company arranges proper monitoring of their franchisee stores in the fright locations as well as maintain good relation with them thus gain huge support from the stakeholders and competitive advantage. Conclusion: Therefore, it can be concluded that this paper discusses the importance of strategic management in the growth of the business of the organizations. There are different approaches that are used by the authorities of any corporations mainly to achieve their goals as well as gaining more competitive advantages. The paper indicates that the strategic tactics have been employed by the eminent organizations to develop approaches which enhance their accuracy in focussing their objects, increase scopes, complexities and the market penetration. The importance of stakeholder approaches is discussed in detail with its viabilities, advantages and limitations. There are various implementation problems that the organization face while apply them in strengthening the organizations as different stakeholders have different interests. The paper discusses how costly the process of information gathering can be and how it affects the companys benefits. The stakeholder approaches greatly supported the bus iness of Starbucks that gain huge popularity as they compactly rely and depend o their stakeholders. They maintain a good relationship thus gain the scopes for innovation and competitive advantage. References: Bergmann, H. and Stephan, U., 2013. Moving on from nascent entrepreneurship: Measuring cross-national differences in the transition to new business ownership.Small business economics,41(4), pp.945-959. Daspit, J.J., Chrisman, J.J., Sharma, P., Pearson, A.W. and Long, R.G., 2017. A Strategic Management Perspective of the Family Firm: Past Trends, New Insights, and Future Directions.Journal of Managerial Issues,29(1), pp.6-29. Debicki, B.J., Van de Graaff Randolph, R. and Sobczak, M., 2017. Socioemotional wealth and family firm performance: A stakeholder approach.Strategic Issues in the Family Firm,29(1), pp.82-111. Georgakakis, D. and Ruigrok, W., 2017. CEO succession origin and firm performance: A multilevel study.Journal of Management Studies,54(1), pp.58-87. Ghezzi, A., Cortimiglia, M.N. and Frank, A.G., 2015. Strategy and business model design in dynamic telecommunications industries: A study on Italian mobile network operators.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,90, pp.346-354. Hammond, N.L., Pearson, A.W. and Holt, D.T., 2016. The quagmire of legacy in family firms: Definition and implications of family and family firm legacy orientations.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,40(6), pp.1209-1231. Hill, C.W., Jones, G.R. and Schilling, M.A., 2014.Strategic management: theory: an integrated approach. Cengage Learning. Kramar, R., 2014. Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach?.The International Journal of Human Resource Management,25(8), pp.1069-1089. Mahto, R.V. and Khanin, D., 2015. Satisfaction with past financial performance, risk taking, and future performance expectations in the family business.Journal of Small Business Management,53(3), pp.801-818. Marvel, M.R., Davis, J.L. and Sproul, C.R., 2016. Human capital and entrepreneurship research: A critical review and future directions.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,40(3), pp.599-626. Moura-Leite, R.C., Padgett, R.C. and Galn, J.I., 2014. Stakeholder management and nonparticipation in controversial business.Business Society,53(1), pp.45-70. ONeill, J.W., 2016. The role of storytelling in affecting organizational reality in the strategic management process.Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management,4(1). Pearson, A.W., Bergiel, E. and Barnett, T., 2014. Expanding the study of organizational behaviour in family business: Adapting team theory to explore family firms.European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,23(5), pp.657-664. Short, J.C., McKenny, A.F., Ketchen, D.J., Snow, C.C. and Hult, G.T.M., 2016. An empirical examination of firm, industry, and temporal effects on corporate social performance.Business Society,55(8), pp.1122-1156. Simsek, Z., Jansen, J.J., Minichilli, A. and Escriba?Esteve, A., 2015. Strategic leadership and leaders in entrepreneurial contexts: A nexus for innovation and impact missed?.Journal of Management Studies,52(4), pp.463-478. Starbucks.com. 2018.Starbucks Company Profile.Starbucks Coffee Company. Retrieved 20 January 2018, from https://www.starbucks.com/about-us/company-information/starbucks-company-profile Tarakci, M., Ates, N.Y. and Wooldridge, B., 2015, January. Performance feedback and middle managers divergent strategic behavior. InAcademy of Management Proceedings(Vol. 2015, No. 1, p. 16577). Xi, J.M., Kraus, S., Filser, M. and Kellermanns, F.W., 2015. Mapping the field of family business research: past trends and future directions.International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,11(1), pp.113-132.